AMERICAN TERRORISTS: WELCOME TO AMERICA,THE NEW LAND OF RACIST AND THUGS WHERE CHRISTIAN FASCISTS AND JEW RACISTS HAVE JOINED HANDS IN THEIR BOND OF HATE OF MANKIND. Anders Breivik’s U.S. Brethren. His extremist views are familiar in America, where hate groups have doubled since 2000—but the targets are Latinos and Obama, says the SPLC’s Heidi Beirich. By Jesse Ellison. In 2000 there were 602 hate groups, and by 2010 that number was about 1,002. The changing demographics in the United States, and in particular the rise of the Latino population, have been increasing the ability of hate groups to recruit because there’s a real fear on the part of people who have racist views that whites are going to be pushed into the minority. Breivik was, of course, concerned about Muslims, but in the United States, most hate groups have focused on Latinos. We only added anti-Islamics to our list of hate groups within the last two years. Starting last summer, around the time of the park 51 protests, anti-Muslim bloggers and others began conducting some pretty fierce protests in Manhattan. People mentioned in the manifesto include JEW TERRORIST SUPPORTER Pam Geller and CHRISTIAN TERRORIST SUPPORTER Robert Spencer, and others with connections to the WHITE CHRISTIAN TERRORIST ORGANISATION the English Defense League, which is a real thuggish group. So we got really, really concerned last summer that we were seeing a new kind of hate explode in a big way.

Anders Behring Breivik, the Norweigan extremist who last week killed 76 people in a bombing and shooting rampage, has claimed that his acts were part of his mission as a member of the Knights Templar, a medieval order whose modern incarnation, he says, is several thousand strong. Thus far, there’s been no indication that his statements are anything other than baseless attempts at self-aggrandizement. But aspects of Breivik’s 1,500-page manifesto are alarmingly familiar. The Daily Beast talked to Heidi Beirich, research director for theSouthern Poverty Law Center, which monitors the rise and rhetoric of hate groups, about Breivik’s animosity toward Islam, parallels with American anti-immigration groups, and what we all can do to help avoid violence as we approach the 10th anniversary of the September 11^th terrorist attacks. Excerpts:

Is Breivik’s belief system an anomaly? Are similar schools of thought being fostered in the United States?

What the Southern Poverty Law Center has been seeing and documenting over the last 10 years has been an inexorable rise in the number of hate groups. In 2000, we documented 602 hate groups, and by 2010 that number was about 1,002. The changing demographics in the United States, and in particular the rise of the Latino population, have been increasing the ability of hate groups to recruit because there’s a real fear on the part of people who have racist views that whites are going to be pushed into the minority.

Breivik was, of course, concerned about Muslims, but in the United States, most hate groups have focused on Latinos.

Yes, we only added anti-Islamics to our list of hate groups within the last two years. Everything has otherwise always been anti-Latino or anti-Obama. But starting last summer, around the time of the park 51 protests, anti-Muslim bloggers and others began conducting some pretty fierce protests in Manhattan. People mentioned in the manifesto include Pam Geller and Robert Spencer, and others with connections to the English Defense League, which is a real thuggish group. So we got really, really concerned last summer that we were seeing a new kind of hate explode in a big way.

Why would this explode now, almost a decade after 9/11?

Well, George W. Bush did a good job of saying unequivocally that, “all Muslims are not responsible for this act,” and “Islam is a religion of peace.” In many ways, Bush’s actions back then calmed things down and they contrast greatly from political figures on the right, today who seem perfectly willing to beat up on Muslims as a way to troll for votes.

 

Mark Wilson / Getty Images

 

But there were a number of high-profile attacks on Sikhs and others, who were mistakenly assumed to be Muslim immediately after the attacks.

Yes, there was a spate of murders right afterwards, which was part of the reason Bush went out and made those statements. It’s unfortunate we’re not seeing that from political figures today. You can see with Breivik what happens when this kind of demonization gets into the mind of someone who is prepared to use violence. In his case we’re seeing a direct correlation between Muslim-bashing ideology and murder. He’d spent hours and hours on the web reading American anti-islamic writers like Robert Spencer and Pam Geller and he thought, “They’re a threat, I need to do something about them.”

Both Spencer and Geller are American writers. Are you concerned that something similar could happen here?

Look. We’re very concerned that with the 10-year anniversary coming of the 9/11 attacks, somebody who is inculcated in this anti-Muslim and anti-Islam ideology in the way that Breivik was could decide to take some form of revenge action. We’ll be talking a lot about the 9/11 attacks in the next few months. So for someone who is really freaked or worked up about Muslims or Islam, this could be the moment they get set off.

“Political figures on the right today seem perfectly willing to beat up on Muslims as a way to troll for votes.

”

Well so what can we do as we approach the anniversary?

People should to be very careful when they’re talking about sensitive subjects not to demonize everyone that adheres to a certain belief system. We saw with the rise of Hitler what happens when you demonize a religion. It makes it that much easier to hurt people. The same applies here. If you’re going to spend all your time talking about how Muslims are here to kill you and destroy your way of life and so on, you can’t act surprised when somebody decides to take up arms against them.

But short of preventing people from voicing these views, what can actually be done?

Right. You can’t control the rhetoric, but what you can say when given the opportunity is, “I don’t agree with this. I don’t want to have anything to do with this.” At the Southern Poverty Law Center, we’re trying our best to point out where the haters are, why their information is hateful, and why it’s dangerous. We’re trying to fight bad free speech with more free speech.

Source: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/07/29/anders-breivik-s-u-s-brethren-hate-groups-surging-in-america-splc-says.html

FIRST THE UGLY JEWISATION OF AMERICA AND NOW THE SAME UGLY JEWISATION OF BRITAIN AND EUROPE IS TAKING PLACE; SAME UGLY JEW ISRAELI TACTICS EVERYWHERE; WHERE HAS ALL THE CIVILITY GONE? An Israeli trap for Britain. In arresting Sheikh Raed Salah, the UK authorities support the persecution of Arab citizens of Israel by Haneen Zoabi. The decision to ban the Palestinian leader Sheikh Raed Salah from entering Britain, and then to arrest him, was transparently not based on any serious examination of his political activities. It was an ugly kneejerk response to the growing hostility of the Jew establishment and its supporters abroad towards anyone opposing its racist policies – and a rising tide of Islamophobia in Europe. Salah is head of the northern branch of the Islamic Movement in Palestine, and three times elected mayor of the Palestinian town of Umm el-Fahm. He and I represent different political organisations and traditions. But there are no legal or legitimate reasons to pursue him. The Jew persecution of him has recently intensified, as have its attacks on leaders of Palestinian citizens more generally.The British authorities have fallen into an Jew trap. Instead of supporting our leaders and their campaign for freedom and democracy, they are supporting Jew persecution of the Palestinian citizens of Israel. Until now, Palestinian citizens have been struggling for our political rights in our country, and confronting Zionist racism inside Jew Israel. But now it seems we have to confront Jew Zionist racism abroad as well. The Jew lobby must not be allowed to determine politics in Britain. Palestinians see the arrest of Salah by the British authorities as backing Jew policies against us. We ask the British people to reject this, not to allow Jew racism to inform them and support instead our just demands for democracy in our own land.

Sheikh Raed Salah, the leader of the Islamic Movement in Israel, has been arrested in Britain. Photograph: Pavel Wolberg/EPA

The decision to ban the Palestinian leader Sheikh Raed Salah from entering Britain, and then to arrest him, was transparently not based on any serious examination of his political activities. It was an ugly kneejerk response to the growing hostility of the Israeli establishment and its supporters abroad towards anyone opposing its racist policies – and a rising tide of Islamophobia in Europe.

Salah is head of the northern branch of the Islamic Movement in Israel, and three times elected mayor of the Palestinian town of Umm el-Fahm. He and I represent different political organisations and traditions. But there are no legal or legitimate reasons to pursue him. The Israeli persecution of him has recently intensified, as have its attacks on leaders of Palestinian citizens of Israel more generally.

So have its demands that those of us struggling for equality recognise Israel as an ethnically or religiously defined Jewish state. There is no other meaning to a “Jewish state” except the recognition of the legitimacy of granting privileges to Jews in Israel at the expense of Palestinian citizens, annulling the legitimacy of our struggle for real democracy.

Because I took part in the first freedom flotilla to break the illegal and inhuman siege of Gaza, the Israeli establishment has waged a propaganda campaign against me, accusing me of “terrorism”, and demanding the withdrawal of my parliamentary immunity and citizenship. This will be difficult to implement, but it threatens my political legitimacy and defines me as a “risk”.

This is what is now happening with Salah. Unable to produce any legal evidence, the Israeli establishment and its supporters in Britain accuse him of antisemitism. Salah has rebutted the fabricated allegations behind these claims and instructed his lawyers to begin legal action against those repeating them.

It appears that the charge of antisemitism is being used as a way of suppressing criticism of Israeli policies. Since when has the struggle for equality become a form of racism? Since when have states that boast of their democratic credentials acquired the right to arrest people for their political views?

The British authorities cannot give one legal reason for Salah’s arrest. His statements against Israeli policies are no stronger than those made by many Israeli leftwingers and humanitarians. But it seems that the British government has bowed to pro-Israel pressure even when it comes to its home affairs.

By arresting and threatening to deport Salah, the British government is denying Palestinians in Israel the right to speak for themselves and make their case to the international community in what is universally understood to be one of the most combustible conflicts in the world. That is why the condemnation of the British government’s action by Palestinian members of the Israeli parliament has been so strong.

Palestinian Israelis are simultaneously part of the Palestinian people and citizens of Israel. Israel established itself in our land, and Israeli citizenship has no meaning for us unless we have equal citizenship to Israeli Jews and unless it permits our campaign for equality. This is what we, and Salah, are doing.

Pro-Israel organisations in Britain and elsewhere are manipulating growing European Islamophobia to discredit us by falsely portraying the democratic Palestinian struggle against racism and discrimination in Israel as antisemitic.

Palestinians experience this Israeli propaganda every day, but we can compare it to the daily racist reality. It is our land that Israel confiscates: 82% so far. We do not have the right to use it. It has constructed 600 Jewish cities and villages and hundreds of Jewish housing communities, which by law we do not have the right to reside in. It is our homes that get demolished, our history that is rewritten. It is we who are separated from our families and excluded from services, education and jobs.

The British authorities have fallen into an Israeli trap. Instead of supporting our leaders and their campaign for freedom and democracy, they are supporting Israeli persecution of the Palestinian citizens of Israel. Until now, Palestinian citizens of Israel have been struggling for our political rights in our country, and confronting Zionist racism inside Israel. But now it seems we have to confront Zionist racism abroad as well.

The pro-Israeli lobby must not be allowed to determine politics in Britain. Palestinians in Israel see the arrest of Salah by the British authorities as backing Israeli policies against us. We ask the British people to reject this, not to allow Israeli racism to inform them and support instead our just demands for democracy in our own land.

Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/jun/29/israeli-trap-britain-raed-salah

AMERICA AND ISRAEL AS THE BIGGEST TERRORISTS IN THE WORLD; ANYBODY WHO HAS GROWN UP IN THE AMERICAN SOUTH KNOWS WHAT IT IS TO LIVE UNDER TERRORISM; Interview: Alice Walker The author and activist, who is setting sail for Gaza on a humanitarian mission, says Israel ‘is the greatest terrorist’ in the Middle East. Pulitzer Prize-winning author Alice Walker will join the flotilla of ships next week that will try to break Israel’s maritime blockade of the Gaza Strip. She says the goal is to bring supplies and raise awareness of the situation there. Last May, during a similar attempt by activists, Israel raided six ships. On one, clashes broke out and Israeli commandos killed nine people. In 2009, I was in Gaza, just after Operation Cast Lead, and I saw the incredible damage and devastation. I have a good understanding of what’s on the ground there and how the water system was destroyed and the sewage system. I saw that the ministries had been bombed, and the hospitals had been bombed, and the schools. I think Israel is the greatest terrorist in that part of the world. And I think in general, the United States and Israel are great terrorist organizations themselves. If you go to Gaza and see some of the bombs — what’s left of the bombs that were dropped — and the general destruction, you would have to say, yeah, it’s terrorism. When you terrorize people, when you make them so afraid of you that they are just mentally and psychologically wounded for life — that’s terrorism. So these countries are terrorist countries. United States has terrorized people around the globe for a very long time. It has fought against countries that have tried to change their governments, that have tried to have democracies, and the United States has intervened and interfered, like in Guatemala or Chile. I feel that it is so unreasonable, and I don’t quite understand how they can claim everyone else is a terrorist and they are not when so many people right this minute are terrified of the drones, for instance, in the war in Afghanistan. The dropping of bombs on people — isn’t that terrorism?

Pulitzer Prize-winning author Alice Walker will join the flotilla of ships next week that will try to break Israel’s maritime blockade of the Gaza Strip. She says the goal is to bring supplies and raise awareness of the situation there. Last May, during a similar attempt by activists, Israel raided six ships. On one, clashes broke out and Israeli commandos killed nine people.

Foreign Policy reached the author of The Color Purple in Greece, where she is preparing for her departure.

Foreign Policy: Why are you taking part in the flotilla mission?

Alice Walker: In 2009, I was in Gaza, just after Operation Cast Lead, and I saw the incredible damage and devastation. I have a good understanding of what’s on the ground there and how the water system was destroyed and the sewage system. I saw that the ministries had been bombed, and the hospitals had been bombed, and the schools. I sat for a good part of a morning in the rubble of the American school, and it just was so painful because we as Americans pay so much of our taxes for this kind of weaponry that was used. On a more sort of mature grandmotherly level I feel that as an elder it is up to me and others like me — other elders, other mature adults — to look at situations like this and bring to them whatever understanding and wisdom we might have gained in our fairly long lifetimes, witnessing and being a part of struggles against oppression.

FP: How long have you been involved in Palestinian activism? What drew you to it?

AW: It started with the Six Day War in 1967. That happened shortly after my wedding to a Jewish law student. And we were very happy because we thought Israel was right to try to defend itself by pre-emptively striking against Egypt. We didn’t realize any of the real history of that area. So, that was my beginning of being interested in what was going on and watching what was happening. Even at that time, I said to my young husband, well, they shouldn’t take that land, because it’s actually not their land. This just seemed so unjust to me. It just seemed so wrong. It’s really unjust because in America we think about Israel in mythical terms. And most of us have grown up with the Bible. So we think that we are sort of akin to these people and whatever they’re saying must be true — their God is giving them land and that is just the reality. But actually the land had people living on it. The people were in their own homes, their own towns and cities. So, the battle has been about them trying to reclaim what was taken from them. It’s important, when we have some new understanding — especially adults and mature adults — we must, I think, take some action so that younger people will have a better understanding of what they are seeing in the world.

FP: Is the goal of this mission, though, to just raise awareness, or is it to actually deliver supplies?

AW: Well, our boat is delivering letters. So what we’re trying to draw attention to is the fact that the blockade is still in effect. On the other boats there will probably be supplies. I haven’t checked but probably things like sewage supplies.

FP: But Egypt has partially reopened its border with Gaza. So, couldn’t you get supplies in through there?

AW: No, you can’t. You can get two suitcases. Not only that, they closed it. They opened it and then closed it. So, that has not been worked out. I know people like to rally around what they think is a positive thing, but it’s not that positive yet because it’s not firm. They limit the number of people. They close it. They say two suitcases. You can’t build a sewage system with two suitcases.

FP: Israel’s ambassador to the United Nations said the stated goal of “humanitarian assistance” was a false pretext for your mission — and it’s actually designed to serve an extremist political agenda, and that many of the groups participating in the mission maintain ties with extremist and terrorist organizations, including Hamas. Your reaction?

AW: I think Israel is the greatest terrorist in that part of the world. And I think in general, the United States and Israel are great terrorist organizations themselves. If you go to Gaza and see some of the bombs — what’s left of the bombs that were dropped — and the general destruction, you would have to say, yeah, it’s terrorism. When you terrorize people, when you make them so afraid of you that they are just mentally and psychologically wounded for life — that’s terrorism. So these countries are terrorist countries.

FP: How is the United States a terrorist country?

AW: It is. Absolutely, it is. It has terrorized people around the globe for a very long time. It has fought against countries that have tried to change their governments, that have tried to have democracies, and the United States has intervened and interfered, like in Guatemala or Chile. I feel that it is so unreasonable, and I don’t quite understand how they can claim everyone else is a terrorist and they are not when so many people right this minute are terrified of the drones, for instance, in the war in Afghanistan. The dropping of bombs on people — isn’t that terrorism?

FP: Of course Israel and the U.S. aren’t the only ones that use bombs. Hamas has fired rockets at Israel in the past.

AW: Yes. And I’m not for a minute saying anybody anywhere should fire rockets. I mean, I would never do it. Nor would I ever supply such a thing to anyone. But it’s extremely unequal. If people just acknowledge how absurdly unequal this is. This is David and Goliath, but Goliath is not the Palestinians. They are David. They are the ones with the slingshot. They are the ones with the rocks and relatively not-so-powerful rockets. Whereas the Israelis have these incredibly damaging missiles and rockets. When do you as a person of conscience speak and say enough is enough?

FP: Are you concerned at all that your trip could be used as a propaganda tool for Hamas?

AW: No, because we will never see those people. Why would we see them?

FP: You don’t think you’re going to see anyone from Hamas?

AW: No. I don’t think we would. If we manage to get through with our bundle of letters we will probably be met by a lot of NGOs, and women and children, and schoolteachers and nurses, and the occasional doctor, if anyone is left.

FP: But doesn’t Hamas control the security apparatus of Gaza?

AW: They may well control it, but we’re not going to see them. It’s like everyone who comes to D.C. doesn’t see the president.

FP: I have to ask, since the previous flotilla trip ended with an Israeli raid on one of the ships and nine people dead. Are you frightened?

AW: Sometimes I feel fear. And the feeling that this may be it. But I’m positive — I’m looking at it as a way to bring attention to these children and their mothers and their grandmothers, and their grandfathers and their fathers, who face this kind of thing every day. I grew up in the South under segregation. So, I know what terrorism feels like — when your father could be taken out in the middle of the night and lynched just because he didn’t look like he was in an obeying frame of mind when a white person said something he must do. I mean, that’s terrorism too. So, I know that feeling. And this is what they are living under. And so, if you ever lived under terrorism yourself — you know terrorism USA, Southern-style — then you understand that people don’t like it and they should not be subjected to it anywhere on the planet.

Source: http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/06/23/interview_alice_walker?page=0,0

FOREIGN JEW WAR CRIMINALS, ARMED TO THE HILT, VERSUS NATIVE INNOCENT PALESTINIANS TOTALLY UNARMED & WITHOUT ANY PROTECTION FROM ANYBODY, EVEN THE UNITED NATIONS IS SILENT UNDER THE PRESSURE OF THE AMERICAN THUGS IN SUITS THROWING THEIR WEIGHT AROUND

Herein lies the crux of Foreign Alien Jew Problem in Palestine

Ron Paul Explains Jew Neocons, their Neoconservatism and their useless idiots, the Christian Zionists and the Pentagoons

Iraqi resistance fighters call for Americans to be castrated on the banks of the Euphrates River by Ernesto Cienfuegos La Voz de Aztlan

As more horrid photographs are released and revelations made public concerning the depraved sexual acts against the Iraqi populace, the entire Arab world is becoming increasingly angrier and more outraged. Yesterday, Iraqi resistance fighters called for Islam to castrate Americans on the banks of the Euphrates River and today an Islamic web site in Egypt showed a video of American Nick Berg of Philadelphia being “decapitated” as revenge for the sexual abuse and torture by American and Jewish interrogators at the Abu Ghraib prison.

Many of the pictures and videos showing the worst sexual atrocities at the prison have not yet been released. The US Senate wants to view them in private prior to their release. Perhaps the US Senate can also view the photographs of the five Latinas La Voz de Aztlan has published at http://www.aztlan.net/latinas_us_military_raped.htm that were also brutally raped by the US military. The US Senate would not escape seeing the suffering and sheer agony in the faces of these women who were wearing US military uniforms when they were also dehumanized, raped and betrayed by the Pentagon.

The situation is bound to get worse as new pictures “dishonoring” Iraqi women are made public. Many of the rapes where photographed and filmed and sold to US pornographic web sites. One of these web sites has shut down ever since La Voz de Aztlan made the information public. The web site at IraqBabes.com showed graphic photographs of Iraqi women and girls being brutally raped and dehumanized by White or Jewish soldiers in mercenary uniforms. The web site was advertised to American perverts as “Horny soldiers having extreme sex in war”, “Extreme gangbangs out of Iraq”, “Iraqi men forced at gunpoint to watch their women f_ _ _k in the dirt”, and “Watch Iraqi bitches royally screwed”.

The above web site and others on the Internet showing brutal rapes of women and other unspeakable depravities against females are intended for viewing by personnel of the US Armed Forces. There is no barrack in any US military fort or installation where there is not a least one depraved US soldier getting off while watching one of these totally filthy web sites. Perhaps these web sites greatly contributed to the rape of the five Latinas in uniform whose lives are now totally in shambles. Also, the graphic violence against women that is shown in these web sites may be greatly contributing to the out of control violence against military spouses.

La Voz de Aztlan prays for the family of Nick Berg, who like Daniel Pearl, must have suffered incredible terror just before his head was cut off. We also pray that Donald Rumsfeld resigns before it is too late for the entire world. We are surely headed towards an impending doom if we don’t stand up and act morally and justly!

---

Please Note: The photograph below has been provided to La Voz de Aztlan alleging that it is not an actress but an Iraqi girl raped by the three mercenaries in uniform. We know for a fact that many pornographic web sites actually do publish real rape photographs and videos and pass them as being done willingly by actresses:

Source: http://www.aztlan.net/castrate.htm

Phil Donahue debates Bill O’Reilly on Iraq War

Kai Wiedenhoefer: Gaza 2010 – “The Book of Destruction”. Exhibition in the Musée d´Art Moderne de la Ville de Paris from 4, November to 5, December featuring 82 color photographs of the aftermath of war in Gaza at the turn of 2009. The exhibit consist of two parts, destroyed buildings and war victims. The photographs were taken between November 2009 and May 2010. The accompanying book is “The Book of Destruction”. AND JEWS ATTACK THE ART MUSEUM FOR SHOWING THE NEEDLESS SUFFERING OF THE PERFECTLY ORDINARY, INNOCENT PALESTINIAN MEN, WOMEN AND CHILDREN AT THE HANDS OF FOREIGN WHITE JEWS FROM GERMANY, AMERICA, RUSSIA AND POLAND ETC. NOW IMMORALLY OCCUPYING PALESTINE OF THE PALESTINIANS; LEST WE FORGET, WHO PAYS FOR THIS CARNAGE: SIMPLE MINDED, UNTHINKING, AMERICAN TAX PAYERS, REMEMBER APRIL 15, FILE YOUR TAXES AND GIVE ISRAEL AND ITS USELESS IDIOTS IN AMERICA MORE MONEY TO CONTINUE THIS MADNESS, AD INFINITUM; Critical thinking is obviously a foreign idea in the American hinterland; onward Bible Thumpers, onward madness

Kai Wiedenhoefer

Gaza 2010 – “The Book of Destruction”

Exhibition in the Musée d´Art Moderne de la Ville de Paris from 4, November to 5, December featuring 82 color photographs of the aftermath of war in Gaza at the turn of 2009. The exhibit consist of two parts, destroyed buildings and war victims. The photographs were taken between November 2009 and May 2010.

The accompanying book “The Book of Destruction” is published by Steidl ISBN 978-3-86930-207-2.

The production of photographs, exhibition and was made possible by the Carmignac Gestion Foundation in the framework of the Carmignac Gestion Photojournalism Award 2009.

IMEMC | November 25, 2010

Members of “The Jewish Defense League” attacked earlier this week a photo exhibition of the German photojournalist Kai Wiedenhöfer “depicting the massacres in the Gaza strip during the Israeli Operation Cast Lead” offensive. The exhibit is being held at the the Modern Art Museum of Paris.

VICTIM: A LITTLE PALESTINIAN GIRL OF JEW & AMERICAN SAVAGERY IN PALESTINE

Gaza exhibition (photo from Euro Palestine)

The employees of the museum explained that a group of people equipped with masks and motorbike helmets tried to reach the gallery to sabotage the exhibition, when museum security blocked their access.

However, the extremists also attempted to vandalize many works displayed alongside the Museum, including paintings by Pablo Picasso, Henri Matisse, Amedeo Modigliani and Marc Chagall, witnesses reported.

After the attempted attack, the group disrupted the visitors’ entrance, chanting slogans against museum, and affixed stickers that read: “Anti-Zionism=Anti-Semitism policy”, “Down anti-Semitism from which it comes” and “Palestinianism asset is the anti-Jewish activism.”

Since the photo exposition was opened at the beginning of November, many French Jews groups, such as CRIF (Representative Council of French Jewish Institutions) have been asking for its closure, putting pressure on Museum officials, and the city Council, an issue that pushed exhibition organizers to consider closing it before the official closing date in December 5.

Several French human rights associations have been mobilized asking the authorities not to cave under pressure, and demanded extra security measures to avoid another attack.

Wiedenhöfer, who has been retracting the Israeli-Palestinian conflict since 1989, has brought 85 realistic and raw photographs to the exhibition, focusing on two major themes;destruction inflicting on Gaza and Palestinians wounded during the Israeli offensive on Gaza in the winter of 2008–2009 that was dubbed by Israel as “Operation Cast Lead”. 

Source: http://alethonews.wordpress.com/2010/11/29/gaza-photo-exhibition-attacked-by-the-jewish-defense-league-in-paris/

AMERICAN ANTI-MUSLIM XENOPHOBIA & BIGOTRY, NOT ONLY BY THE ILL-EDUCATED AND THE ISRAEL FIRSTERS CHRISTIAN ZIONIST TYPE, BUT ALSO THE PSEUDO-INTELLECTUALS IN ILL-FITTING SUITS AND GARISH TIES; AMERICA INDEED HAS BECOME THE LAUGHING STOCK OF THE WORLD WITH ITS HOLLOW AND SHAM CLAIMS OF BEING A CIVILISED COUNTRY; Bachmann And Fischer, No First Amendment Rights For Muslims? Attacks on Muslims are not only physical there is an intellectual current at work too. This phenomena can be seen in North America with the comment of Bryan Fischer, Right Wing Watch has more: “While the American Family Association claims that one of its founding objectives is to “defends the rights of conscience and religious liberty from infringement by government,” its chief spokesman r continues to show his contempt for religious freedom. Fischer, the AFA’s Director of Issues Analysis, repeatedly demanded that the US deport all Muslims and prohibit and purge Muslims from the military, and also called for the banning and destruction of mosques. Fischer today attempted to reconcile his ardent opposition to Muslim religious liberty with the Constitution’s First Amendment by claiming that the Constitution actually doesn’t apply to or protect Muslims at all: Islam has no fundamental First Amendment claims, for the simple reason that it was not written to protect the religion of Islam. Islam is entitled only to the religious liberty we extend to it out of courtesy. While there certainly ought to be a presumption of religious liberty for non-Christian religious traditions in America, the Founders were not writing a suicide pact when they wrote the First Amendment. Our government has no obligation to allow a treasonous ideology to receive special protections in America, but this is exactly what the Democrats are trying to do right now with Islam. From a constitutional point of view, Muslims have no First Amendment right to build mosques in America. They have that privilege at the moment, but it is a privilege that can be revoked if, as is in fact the case, Islam is a totalitarian ideology dedicated to the destruction of the United States. The Constitution, it bears repeating, is not a suicide pact. For Muslims, patriotism is not the last refuge of a scoundrel, but the First Amendment is. To Europeans and others this might seem like irrelevant nonsense, but the United States Constitution is key to political matters within the US of A and no more so than the First Amendment.

Attacks on Muslims are not only physical there is an intellectual current at work too. This phenomena can be seen in North America with the comment of Bryan Fischer, Right Wing Watch has more:

“While the American Family Association claims that one of its founding objectives is to “defends the rights of conscience and religious liberty from infringement by government,” its chief spokesman r continues to show his contempt for religious freedom. Fischer, the AFA’s Director of Issues Analysis,repeatedly demanded that the US deport all Muslims and prohibit and purge Muslims from the military, and also called for the banning and destruction of mosques. Fischer today attempted to reconcile his ardent opposition to Muslim religious liberty with the Constitution’s First Amendment by claiming that the Constitution actually doesn’t apply to or protect Muslims at all:

Islam has no fundamental First Amendment claims, for the simple reason that it was not written to protect the religion of Islam. Islam is entitled only to the religious liberty we extend to it out of courtesy. While there certainly ought to be a presumption of religious liberty for non-Christian religious traditions in America, the Founders were not writing a suicide pact when they wrote the First Amendment.

Our government has no obligation to allow a treasonous ideology to receive special protections in America, but this is exactly what the Democrats are trying to do right now with Islam.

From a constitutional point of view, Muslims have no First Amendment right to build mosques in America. They have that privilege at the moment, but it is a privilege that can be revoked if, as is in fact the case, Islam is a totalitarian ideology dedicated to the destruction of the United States. The Constitution, it bears repeating, is not a suicide pact. For Muslims, patriotism is not the last refuge of a scoundrel, but the First Amendment is.

To Europeans and others this might seem like irrelevant nonsense, but the United States Constitution is key to political matters within the US of A and no more so than the First Amendment.

This is how Cornell Law School describes the importance of the First Amendment:

“The First Amendment of the United States Constitution protects the right to freedom of religion and freedom of expression from government interference. See U.S. Const. amend. I. Freedom of expression consists of the rights to freedom of speech, press, assembly and to petition the government for a redress of grievances, and the implied rights of association and belief. The Supreme Court interprets the extent of the protection afforded to these rights. The First Amendment has been interpreted by the Court as applying to the entire federal government even though it is only expressly applicable to Congress. Furthermore, the Court has interpreted, the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as protecting the rights in the First Amendment from interference by state governments. See U.S. Const. amend. XIV.

Two clauses in the First Amendment guarantee freedom of religion. The establishment clause prohibits the government from passing legislation to establish an official religion or preferring one religion over another. It enforces the “separation of church and state.” Some governmental activity related to religion has been declared constitutional by the Supreme Court. For example, providing bus transportation for parochial school students and the enforcement of “blue laws” is not prohibited. The free exercise clause prohibits the government, in most instances, from interfering with a person’s practice of their religion.”

Most American politicians, and certainly anyone remotely educated, in the US would understand that, as it is drilled into them in school and college, yet Fischer chooses to deny the accepted meaning of the First Amendment and applicable to all.

So why Michele Bachmann didn’t take this matter up with Fischer when she was interviewed on his showrecently is a mystery, possibly her connection to the Tea Party overrides her commitment to the First Amendment?

Just in case any Tea Partyers read this, here’s a refresher:

“Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”

That applies to all, including Muslims in the US and people should remember that.

Source: http://modernityblog.wordpress.com/2011/03/26/bachmann-and-fischer-no-first-amendment-rights-for-muslims/

THE AMERICAN, BRITISH, FRENCH AND THE HIDDEN LUNATIC JEW ISRAELI THUGS AND THEIR MACHINATIONS; Libya is Another Case of Selective Vigilantism by the West. Bombing Tripoli while shoring up other despots in the Arab world shows the UN-backed strikes to oust Gaddafi are purely cynical By Tariq Ali. The US-Nato intervention in Libya, with United Nations security council cover, is part of an orchestrated response to show support for the movement against one dictator in particular and by so doing to bring the Arab rebellions to an end by asserting western control, confiscating their impetus and spontaneity and trying to restore the status quo ante. It is absurd to think that the reasons for bombing Tripoli or for the turkey shoot outside Benghazi are designed to protect civilians. This particular argument is designed to win support from the citizens of Euro-America and part of the Arab world. “Look at us,” say Obama/Clinton and the EU satraps, “we’re doing good. We’re on the side of the people.” The sheer cynicism is breathtaking. We’re expected to believe that the leaders with bloody hands in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan are defending the people in Libya. All this might trigger a third phase at some stage: a growing nationalist anger that spills over into Saudi Arabia and here, have no doubt, Washington will do everything necessary to keep the Saudi royal family in power. Lose Saudi Arabia and they will lose the Gulf states. The assault on Libya, greatly helped by Gaddafi’s imbecility on every front, was designed to wrest the initiative back from the streets by appearing as the defenders of civil rights. The Bahrainis, Egyptians, Tunisians, Saudi Arabians, Yemenis will not be convinced, and even in Euro-America more are opposed to this latest adventure than support it. The struggles are by no means over. Obama talks of a merciless Gaddafi, but the west’s own mercy never drops like gentle rain from heaven upon the place beneath. It only blesses the power that dispenses, the mightiest of the mightiest.

Libya’s European ties … a man holds a British and a French national flag in Benghazi. Photograph: Manu Brabo/EPA

The US-Nato intervention in Libya, with United Nations security council cover, is part of an orchestrated response to show support for the movement against one dictator in particular and by so doing to bring the Arab rebellions to an end by asserting western control, confiscating their impetus and spontaneity and trying to restore the status quo ante.

It is absurd to think that the reasons for bombing Tripoli or for the turkey shoot outside Benghazi are designed to protect civilians. This particular argument is designed to win support from the citizens of Euro-America and part of the Arab world. “Look at us,” say Obama/Clinton and the EU satraps, “we’re doing good. We’re on the side of the people.” The sheer cynicism is breathtaking. We’re expected to believe that the leaders with bloody hands in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan are defending the people in Libya. The debased British and French media are capable of swallowing anything, but the fact that decent liberals still fall for this rubbish is depressing. Civil society is easily moved by some images and Gaddafi’s brutality in sending his air force to bomb his people was the pretext that Washington utilised to bomb another Arab capital. Meanwhile, Obama’s allies in the Arab world were hard at work promoting democracy.

The Saudis entered Bahrain where the population is being tyrannised and large-scale arrests are taking place. Not much of this is being reported on al-Jazeera. I wonder why? The station seems to have been curbed somewhat and brought into line with the politics of its funders.

All this with active US support. The despot in Yemen, loathed by a majority of his people continues to kill them every day. Not even an arms embargo, let alone a “no-fly zone” has been imposed on him. Libya is yet another case of selective vigilantism by the US and its attack dogs in the west.

They can rely on the French as well. Sarkozy was desperate to do something. Unable to save his friend Ben Ali in Tunisia, he’s decided to help get rid of Gaddafi. The British always oblige and in this case, having shored up the Libyan regime for the last two decades, they’re making sure they’re on the right side so as not to miss out on the division of the spoils. What might they get?

The divisions on this entire operation within the American politico-military elite have meant there is no clear goal. Obama and his European satraps talk of regime change. The generals resist and say that isn’t part of their picture. The US state department is busy preparing a new government composed of English-speaking Libyan collaborators. We will now never know how long Gaddafi’s crumbling and weakened army would have held together in the face of strong opposition. The reason he lost support within his armed forces was precisely because he ordered them to shoot their own people. Now he speaks of imperialism’s desire to topple him and take the oil and even many who despise him can see that it’s true. A new Karzai is on the way.

The frontiers of the squalid protectorate that the west is going to create are being decided in Washington. Even those Libyans who, out of desperation, are backing Nato’s bomber jets, might – like their Iraqi equivalents – regret their choice.

All this might trigger a third phase at some stage: a growing nationalist anger that spills over into Saudi Arabia and here, have no doubt, Washington will do everything necessary to keep the Saudi royal family in power. Lose Saudi Arabia and they will lose the Gulf states. The assault on Libya, greatly helped by Gaddafi’s imbecility on every front, was designed to wrest the initiative back from the streets by appearing as the defenders of civil rights. The Bahrainis, Egyptians, Tunisians, Saudi Arabians, Yemenis will not be convinced, and even in Euro-America more are opposed to this latest adventure than support it. The struggles are by no means over.

Obama talks of a merciless Gaddafi, but the west’s own mercy never drops like gentle rain from heaven upon the place beneath. It only blesses the power that dispenses, the mightiest of the mightiest.

Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/mar/29/libya-west-tripoli-arab-world-gaddafi?INTCMP=SRCH